Hello everyone !
I've seen a lot of people
on Twitter, Booktube and such say that people who DNF a book
shouldn't write reviews about them. As you may have guessed - since I
have a DNF section on this blog – I disagree.
But on the other hand , I
think it's interesting to see why someone would DNF a book :
- What was so
unbearable ?
- Did they notice
something I didn't ?
What I like about those
types of reviews is that – by definition – they're about the 1/3
or 2/3 of a book which means that they won't be influenced by a huge
thing happening at the end.
Let's take And I Darken
by Kirsten White for instance. I wasn't sure about this book so I
read on Goodreads the most popular reviews.
They were all positive
and described how complex the story and its characters were, how it
was much more than the premise let on and how mind-blowing the plot
twist was towards the end. I started reading the book and I was
surprised to see that no one mentioned how slow and tedious the
beginning was. I didn't feel connected to the characters, I didn't
care about the political aspect of the book (and I love politics) and
I didn't find anything remotely feminist about this book. Having a
strong independent female character doesn't mean anything if that
character looks down on other women.
I checked the reviews on
GR again but this time I only read the negative ones – which were mostly
written by people who DNF the book – and they all had the same
issues I had (they also mentioned how historically unaccurate it
was).
I'm not saying those
reviews were valid and the positive ones weren't. I'm saying that
it's important that we have the option to read both sides. I tend to
DNF a lot and I like knowing that I'm not the only one. It's good to
know that other people share your unpopular opinions (whether it's
because you liked a book or not).
However, writing this
kind of review can be tricky : You only have to talk about
the parts of the book you've read.
I read some reviews
saying « oh I didn't like this and that and at the end she even
did this », how would you know since you didn't finish the
book ? Reading reviews of people who read the book doesn't give
you the right to use their opinions to back up your own review. Even
if it's written by someone you trust.
You can read a whole
scene from the book and then make your mind about it but don't just
read some quotes and think that you know what and how it happened.
It's just like with the
controversy about Carve the Mark. Someone wrote a review saying it
was racist and had other issues and everyone shared it even though
they didn't read the book. Some people who read it apologized saying
they didn't notice the racism (I don't know about the other issues)
and other people said it is not racist and they explained why in
their own reviews. I can't tell you if it is or isn't because I
haven't read it but I think you shouldn't agree with a review about a
book you haven't even opened.
What do you
think ?
Do you review the books you DNF ?
Hope you enjoyed, see you
next time.
I don't DNF a lot, so I've never written a DNF review. Normally when I DNF something anyways, it's simply because I lost interest and not because of a big reason or anything. But I do love reading DNF reviews! I personally enjoy reading negative reviews more than positive ones. That way, my expectations are lowered and then I'm either prepared when reading it or blown away by how much I enjoy it! My only problem is when people do a DNF review of a book that they only read 10 percent of. I personally think that's a bit silly, because you've only read a mere fraction of the book. What might seem "problematic" in the beginning might be addressed, and son on. After the reader has gotten to the twenty mark though, I'm all for DNF reviews! I just don't see how a reader can get a good grasp of a book when they read so little of it. I don't know...just my opinion! I do want to write some DNF reviews now! XD Great post Lys!
RépondreSupprimerI didn't think about that before but now that I think about it, it's a great way to lower expectations ! Like many bookworms I tend to expect too much so I think I'll try that.
SupprimerI agree with you, you can't judge a book based on its beginning. I usually DNF around 50%.
Haha negative reviews are always easier to write ~
I agree with negative reviews being easier to write! You don't have to explain and go as in depth, you can just rant! And to be honest, they are kinda fun. XD
SupprimerAre you officially a member of DNFers clan now ? *.*
SupprimerI don't DNF often, but when I do I'll usually say on Goodreads (or maybe even on my blog) why I DNF'd it - not a full review.
RépondreSupprimerI used to do that until I realized I had a lot of things to say about them.
SupprimerI do review books I DNF. I don't tend to DNF a lot, so when I do, I feel like it's worth talking about? I don't do a big review or anything (mostly because there isn't usually a lot to say since I've only read between 1/4 and 1/2 of the book) but I like to say something! I agree that you shouldn't base your review off of someone else's feelings and opinions, too. Because... how do you know? It's one thing to decide not to finish because you read something, but another to then transform it into your own review.
RépondreSupprimerI have said when reviews have helped me make my decision to DNF, though, so Idk if that is the same thing? I also think DNF reviews can be very helpful, because maybe the thing that made one reader NOT able to finish is something that doesn't bother another reader at all- and that is good info to have! Great topic!
Exactly ! It's just like recommending books you haven't read, you can never know if you're going to like a book or not.
SupprimerI don't think it's the same thing. As long as you mention it and don't make it your own, it's okay.
You're right. Before reading Gilded Cage (an amazing book btw) I read a negative review saying that it was too political and it pushed me to pick up the book.
I don't DNF a lot or have many DNF reviews, but I have nothing against them. In fact I agree they can be helpful- you can't really know about a book without seeing the positive AND negative reviews, seems to me. After all one person's DNF is another person's 5 star, so I like to see all different opinions. Sometimes DNF reviews are the best ones! They might cover something that the other reviews aren't addressing.
RépondreSupprimerYou're absolutely right !
SupprimerI don’t write long reviews for books I DNF, but I do usually put a few sentences on Goodreads about why I DNFed. I think DNF reviews are useful. If I have similar reading tastes to the reviewer, the review might make me rethink my desire to read the book. Life is too short to read bad books.
RépondreSupprimerAj @ Read All The Things!
*nods* so true. I DNF a lot (maybe too much), I really don't like wasting time on a book I'm not enjoying.
SupprimerOOO I didn't know this was a controversial topic lately. I love reading DNF reviews (unless they're for my absolute favorite books because then I end up wanting to tell them to give it another try). Whenever I pick up a book I haven't heard much about I read both the best and the worst reviews so that I'll be more properly prepared. I personally don't DNF that often but I'm trying not to waste time on books I'm not enjoying, but when I do DNF and review them they tend to be shorter reviews because I haven't read as much. But DNF reviews are definitely worth existing because that's another opinion on a book!
RépondreSupprimerHaha me too ! I can't read the negative reviews of my favorite books, they're too important to me.
SupprimerHey. Just wanted to let you know I've tagged you in the Mystery Blogger Award. Check out my post for the rules and questions: https://scorpiobookdreams.co.uk/mystery-blogger-award
RépondreSupprimerThanks ! ^^
SupprimerI DNF'd And I Darken for that exact reason. I was about 150 pages in and just gave up because NOTHING happened! I still write DNF reviews and I like reading DNF reviews (most of the time). For me, it's more of HOW MUCH did they read/I read? If I only read 10 pages and then gave up, I'm not going to review that or READ a review of someone who did. On the other hand, if someone read nearly half or over half and decided to give up, I think that can be helpful. Usually you have an opinion about a book by then so knowing that someone just couldn't handle the writing, or the main character, or the slow pacing by that point is helpful when deciding to read a book for me :) Great discussion!
RépondreSupprimerI know ! I don't know why people like it so much.
SupprimerI agree with you. There is no point in reviewing a book you barely read.
You're right, it can be very helpful !
I rarely DNF so I don't write those reviews unless it is a review copy which hasn't happened yet, luckily. However I did do a post a while ago about some of the books I dnfed over the years and why. Like you say, I think it can be good to read why people have dnfed. And if you don't care for those kind of reviews, you can just skip them? Instead of complaining about them?
RépondreSupprimerExactly ! You don't have to read them if you don't want to but saying that there shouldn't be any is a little extreme.
SupprimerI think with DNF reviews it's important to mention how far your ad so readers know to which part of the book your thoughts apply. I do write DNF reviews on Goodreads and sometimes post them at once on my blog at the end of the year, but I rarely DNF. I also think both positive and negative reviews and DNF reviews can be helpful when deciding whether to read a book.
RépondreSupprimerYou're right I started doing that recently, like you said, it's important.
SupprimerWe definitely need both positive and negative reviews !
I think DNF reviews are important, I just think that maybe there shouldn't be a star rating when you're posting one. But stating why The book utterly bored and devastated you is definitely important! I almost never DNF myself, I don't even know how, but reading other people's DNF reviews has helped me in the past :) good post!
RépondreSupprimerIt's interesting because I hesitated a lot before choosing not to rate the books I DNF. On one hand it felt wrong to rate a book I didn't completely read but on the other hand if a lot of people DNF a book and only a few gave it 4-5 stars, the ratings wouldn't be helpful.
SupprimerBut I think not rating them is better.
Thanks !
I think everyone has the right to write a review even if they did DNF the book. That the review will explain why someone DNFed the book and that is constructive criticism. However, I don't think they should rate it. In my opinion, it is not fair to rate a book with one star if a person hasn't finished it.
RépondreSupprimerGreat discussion topic. Happy readings!
Tânia @MyLovelySecret
I usually don't rate the books I DNFed. You'right, it is kind of unfair to rate only the part of the book you've read and the whole book.
SupprimerThanks :D
This is important and I've not thought about it much before, I will now aspire to review a DNF adding my reasons without completely trashing the book, because others might enjoy it.
RépondreSupprimerI love writing and reading DNF reviews !
SupprimerI will offer an opposing opinion to the discussion and hope you don't hate me for it lol. I don't write reviews for books I've DNFed. I've read a lot of books where I was bothered by things in the beginning, but then those things turned out to be purposely written that way (like a character was unlikeable on purpose, or something didn't seem to make sense but it actually had an explanation), or I was bothered by some things, but then the book got so much better or something by the end made it worth it. I just don't feel like part of a book is enough for me to base a review on. And for that same reason, I tend to not use DNF reviews when making my decision to read a book. (Though I might read them after I've finished a book to see other people's thoughts or something.)
RépondreSupprimerWhat really bothers me though is what Gennifer mentioned where the person reads such a small amount of the book and then rates it low and rants about it. I've seen some DNF reviews where the person read like 2 pages. To me that's not DNFing, it's just not even starting, and that seems really unfair to the author.
Haha don't worry I don't hate you !
SupprimerYou make a really good point but (of course there was going to be a but lol) I disagree when you say that "something by the end" can make a book worth it. Reading takes time, especially when it's a long book, and I really don't like wasting my time reading a book with 300 bad/meh pages even if it has a great ending. I think readers should know what to expect and what made the reviewer DNF the book.
On that point I 100% agree with you.
See I do think a good ending or a twist or a book that gets better as it goes and finishes strong can make it worth it (depending on the book/ending). So I guess that explains why we feel differently about DNFs and why DNF reviews are helpful to you but not quite so much to me. It's neat getting to understand how other readers feel about things :-)
RépondreSupprimerMaybe I'm a difficult reader haha
Supprimer